Christopher Robert Lute v. Stan Sniff
| Christopher Robert Lute |
| William Di Yorio and Sheriff Stan Sniff |
| 5:2017cv01722 |
| August 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S. Fischer |
| Sheri Pym |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer, Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the Third Amended Complaint and this action are dismissed with prejudice. Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 112 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PAY: INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) The plaintiff has not complied with 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (b)(1) and is hereby ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to timely pay the initial partial filing fee. Plaintiff may file a response to this Order to Show Cause no later than twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Ord er. Failure to file a response within the time specified may be deemed consent to the dismissal without prejudice of this action. If the initial partial filing fee is received within the twenty-one (21) day period, no further response to this Order to Show Cause is necessary. (iva)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
