James Rutherford et al v. Cho-Park LLC et al
| James Rutherford and The Association 4 Equal Access |
| Cho-Park, LLC and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 5:2017cv01888 |
| September 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| George H Wu |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. Dismissal is With Prejudice. (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 19
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT by Judge George H. Wu: On January 17, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Settlement. The Court sets an Order to Show re: Settlement Hearing for February 22, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. Counsel for Plaintiff is advised the order to show cause will be vacated and no appearance will be required provided a Notice of Dismissal, is filed by February 21, 2018. The order to show cause issued on January 8, 2018 is DISCHARGED. (cr)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Settlement of entire case filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak) |
|
Filing 17
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge George H. Wu: The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than January 22, 2018 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. Please refer to the Court's order for additional information. (cr)
|
| Filing 16 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Cho-Park, LLC a California limited liability company doing business as Quality Inn and Suites. (mrgo) |
| Filing 15 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant All Plaintiffs filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declration in Support of Entry of Default) (Hashemi, Babak) |
|
Filing 14
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge George H. Wu: The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than December 28, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. Please refer to the Court's order for additional information. (cr)
|
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Cho-Park, LLC served on 9/29/2017, answer due 10/20/2017. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendant Cho-Park, LLC. (mrgo) |
| Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu: You are instructed to read and to follow (unless otherwise superseded herein) the Central District of California Local Rules (henceforth "Local Rules") 16-1 through 16-15 regarding pre-trial requirements. Please refer to the Court's order for additional information. (cr)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #8 . The following error(s) was found: Summons cannot be issued because the incorrect court name is on the summons. The court name on the summons must show "Central District of California." The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (mrgo) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #4 . The following error(s) was found: "Summons cannot be issued because the incorrect court name is on the summons. The court name on the summons must show "Central District of California." The filer must correct this error in order for the summons to be issued.". The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access, identifying CHO-PARK, LLC., a California limited liability company, d/b/a QUALITY INN & SUITES. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-20512206 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Attorney Babak Hashemi added to party James Rutherford(pty:pla), Attorney Babak Hashemi added to party The Association 4 Equal Access(pty:pla))(Hashemi, Babak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
