Charmaine A. Castro v. Fiesta Ford, Inc. et al
| Charmaine A Castro and Charmaine A. Castro |
| Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC, Ford Motor Company, Fiesta Ford, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 5:2017cv01964 |
| September 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Contract: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 42
ORDER ON STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)(1)(A) (ii) #41 by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: By the stipulation, the Parties agreed that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Therefore, good cause having been shown and the parties having stipulated to same, the Court hereby makes the following order: IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. This entire action is dismissed with prejudice, and each party shall bear their own fees and costs. (bm)
|
| Filing 41 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Plaintiff Charmaine A. Castro. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Le Pere, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 40 Effective April 19, 2018, Judge Rosenberg will be located at the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building, COURTROOM 550 on the 5th floor, located at 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, California 90012. All Court appearances shall be made in Courtroom 550 of the Roybal Federal Building, and all mandatory chambers copies shall be hand delivered to the judge's mail box located outside the Clerk's Office on the 12th floor of the Roybal Federal Building. The location for filing civil and criminal documents in paper format exempted from electronic filing and for viewing case files and other records services is located at the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, 255 East Temple Street, Room 180 (Terrace Level), Los Angeles, California 90012. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rrp) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 39
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: On December 14, 2017, the Court issued an order instructing the parties to file their stipulation and order for dismissal or judgment by February 9, 2018, in light of the parties settlement. As of this date no dismissal order has been filed. It is therefore ordered that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm)
|
|
Filing 38
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS ORDER AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: In light of the notice of settlement, filed December 11, 2017, indicating that the case has settled in its entirety, this action is placed in inactive status. By February 9, 2018 the parties shall file either a proper stipulation and order for dismissal or judgment. Failure to timely file a stipulation and order for dismissal or judgment shall result in the dismissal of this action. All pending deadlines and hearing dates are hereby VACATED. (shb)
|
| Filing 37 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Charmaine A. Castro. (Le Pere, Jeffrey) |
|
Filing 36
ORDER by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall GRANTING Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer (More than 30 days) #33 . FORD and FIESTA FORD shall have up to and including December 11, 2017 to respondto the Complaint. Defendants Fiesta Ford, Inc. answer due 12/11/2017; Ford Motor Company answer due 12/11/2017. (shb)
|
| Filing 35 NOTICE OF LODGING filed [Proposed] Order re Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply #30 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) |
|
Filing 34
ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT #31 #33 by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: Due to ongoing settlement discussions, the parties further stipulate that FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY shall have up to and including December 11, 2017 to respond to the Complaint. (vv)
|
| Filing 33 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to December 11, 2017 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Le, An) |
| Filing 32 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply #31 , Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply #30 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
| Filing 31 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC.(Le, An) |
| Filing 30 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response filed by Defendants Fiesta Ford, Inc., Ford Motor Company.(Hugret, Spencer) |
| Filing 29 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Spencer Peter Hugret on behalf of Defendants Fiesta Ford, Inc., Ford Motor Company (Hugret, Spencer) |
|
Filing 28
ORDER by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: GRANTING #27 Request to Substitute Attorney Spencer P Hugret in place of Joseph A. Gibbs. Attorney Joseph Ashley Gibbs terminated (shb)
|
| Filing 27 APPLICATION TO WITHDRAW ATTORNEY Joseph A. Gibbs as counsel of record filed by Defendant Fiesta Ford, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Gibbs, Joseph) |
| Filing 26 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response filed by Defendant Fiesta Ford, Inc..(Attorney Spencer Peter Hugret added to party Fiesta Ford, Inc.(pty:dft))(Hugret, Spencer) |
|
Filing 25
MINUTE IN VACATING AND DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: In light of the stipulations filed on October 30, 2017 [Doc. Nos. 19, 21], the Order to Show Cause [Doc. No. 17] is hereby vacated and discharged. (shb)
|
|
Filing 24
ORDER by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall granting Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Complaint #21 . Defendant Ford Motor Company answer is due 11/27/2017. (shb)
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER granting Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #19 , by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. Defendant and Plaintiff hereby stipulate and agree that Defendant, Ford Motor Credit Corp shall have to and including November 22, 2017 to respond to the Complaint. (shb) Modified on 11/2/2017 (shb).
|
| Filing 22 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply #21 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
| Filing 21 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company.(Attorney Spencer Peter Hugret added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Hugret, Spencer) |
| Filing 20 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC, (Le, An) |
| Filing 19 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC answer now due 11/22/2017, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC.(Attorney An Le added to party Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC(pty:dft))(Le, An) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER GRANTING Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint #16 ., Defendant Fiesta Ford, Inc., Answer due 11/13/2017 by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall (shb)
|
|
Filing 17
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: The court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before November 13, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to defendants Ford Motor Company and Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as anappropriate response to this Order To Show Cause, on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: An answer by the following defendant(s): Ford Motor Company and Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC. Plaintiff's application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It is plaintiff's responsibility to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filingproofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. See order for further details. (shb)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint filed by Defendant Fiesta Ford, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Stipulation)(Attorney Joseph Ashley Gibbs added to party Fiesta Ford, Inc.(pty:dft))(Gibbs, Joseph) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Charmaine A. Castro, upon Defendant Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC served on 10/4/2017, answer due 10/25/2017. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Gabriela Sanchez - person Authorized to accept in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Le Pere, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Charmaine A. Castro, upon Defendant Ford Motor Company served on 10/4/2017, answer due 10/25/2017. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Gabriela Sanchez - person Authorized to accept in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Le Pere, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Charmaine A. Castro, upon Defendant Fiesta Ford, Inc. served on 10/4/2017, answer due 10/25/2017. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Linda Hall - Person in Charge in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Le Pere, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Fiesta Ford, Inc., Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC. (shb) |
| Filing 11 STANDING ORDER. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THIS CASE AND MAY DIFFER IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Honorable Consuelo B. Marshall. Both the Court and the attorneys bear responsibility for the progress of litigation in the this Court. To secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action, all counsel are ordered to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the Central District of California. ED.R.CIV.P 1. NONCOMPLIANCE MAY LEAD TO THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS, INCLUDING THE STRIKING OF PLEADINGS AND ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OR DISMISSAL OF THE ACTION. See order for further details. (shb) |
| Filing 10 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Charmaine A. Castro, (Le Pere, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Charmaine A. Castro. (Le Pere, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice (Other) #4 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: The name and address of the attorney for plaintiff(s)must be entered in the appropriate field. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Hallen David Rosner counsel for Plaintiff Charmaine A Castro. Adding Hallen David Rosner as counsel of record for Charmaine A. Castro for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Charmaine A. Castro. (Attorney Hallen David Rosner added to party Charmaine A Castro(pty:pla))(Rosner, Hallen) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Charmaine A Castro. (Le Pere, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Charmaine A Castro. (Le Pere, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Charmaine A Castro. (Le Pere, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-20573304 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Charmaine A Castro. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4) (Attorney Jeffrey L Le Pere added to party Charmaine A Castro(pty:pla))(Le Pere, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
