Kevin Roy v. Wells Fargo Auto Finance
Plaintiff: Kevin Roy
Defendant: Wells Fargo Auto Finance
Case Number: 5:2017cv02001
Filed: October 2, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M. Gee
Presiding Judge: Shashi H. Kewalramani
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF ACTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: IT IS HERE BY ORDERED that pursuant to the parties' Stipulation 19 , the case is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs. (gk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kevin Roy v. Wells Fargo Auto Finance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Roy
Represented By: Trinette Gragirena Kent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Auto Finance
Represented By: Courtney Camilla Wenrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?