Grant Fritsch v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Grant Fritsch
Defendant: Does, Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Swift Transportation Company and Swift Transportation Services, LLC
Case Number: 5:2017cv02226
Filed: October 31, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jesus G. Bernal
Presiding Judge: Sheri Pym
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 113 JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. JUDGMENT is entered in this action as follows: Plaintiffs Grant Fritsch, Bill Barker, Tab Bachman and William Yingling, the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency, and certified class. IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED. (See document for further details) (yl)
December 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MINUTE Order (1) GRANTING Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Dkt. No. 14 ); (2) REMANDING the case to state court; and (3) VACATING the December 11, 2017 Hearing (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS). In sum, the Court finds Defendant has proven the amount in controversy is approximately $4,778,575, which does not exceed the jurisdictional minimum. Thus, the Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff's claims. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion and REMANDS the action to state court. (Case Remanded to San Bernardino County Superior Court, CIVDS81518012. MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (iva)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grant Fritsch v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Represented By: Jacqueline Beaumont
Represented By: John T Egley
Represented By: Joshua G Simon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Swift Transportation Company
Represented By: Jacqueline Beaumont
Represented By: John T Egley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Swift Transportation Services, LLC
Represented By: Jacqueline Beaumont
Represented By: John T Egley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Grant Fritsch
Represented By: Brian Daniel Hefelfinger
Represented By: Daniel J Palay
Represented By: Rabiah A Rahman
Represented By: Michael Anthony Strauss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?