Nekeyia Necole Weatherspoon v. United States of America

Petitioner: Nekeyia Necole Weatherspoon
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 5:2017cv02277
Filed: November 8, 2017
Court: California Central District Court
Presiding Judge: Virginia A. Phillips
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 24, 2018 9 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips, in favor of United States of America against Nekeyia Necole Weatherspoon: Pursuant to the Order Denying Movant Nekeiya Necole Weatherspoon's Section 2255 Motion filed concurrently herewith. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Movant's claims against Respondent are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court orders that such judgment be entered. (bm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nekeyia Necole Weatherspoon v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Assistant 2241-2255 US Attorney LA-CR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nekeyia Necole Weatherspoon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?