Beatrice Rodriguez v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Plaintiff: Beatrice Rodriguez
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 5:2017cv02299
Filed: November 13, 2017
Court: California Central District Court
Referring Judge: Alexander F. MacKinnon
Presiding Judge: James V. Selna
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 24, 2018 27 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon, in favor of Nancy A. Berryhill against Beatrice Rodriguez Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 26 . IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbou)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beatrice Rodriguez v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beatrice Rodriguez
Represented By: Denise Bourgeois Haley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?