Antonio Osmond Fahie v. Ironwood State Prison et al
| Antonio Osmond Fahie |
| M.D. Vache Chakmakian, Ironwood State Prison, J Michael Lee and Neil McDowell |
| 5:2017cv02360 |
| November 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Sheri Pym |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, in favor of J Michael Lee, Vache Chakmakian against Antonio Osmond Fahie Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 23 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the Second Amended Complaint and this action are dismissed without leave to amend. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbou)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym, re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), 1 . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Within 30 days of the date of this order, or by April 11, 2018, plaintiff may file a Firs t Amended Complaint to attempt to cure the deficiencies discussed above. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail plaintiff a blank Central District civil rights complaint form to use for filing the First Amended Complaint, which plaintiff is encouraged to utilize. (See document for further information). Plaintiff is cautioned that his failure to timely comply with this Order may result in a recommendation that this action, or portions thereof, be dismissed. (dv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
