Alfred L. Brooks v. D. Borders
Petitioner: Alfred L. Brooks
Respondent: D. Borders
Case Number: 5:2017cv02535
Filed: December 21, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: R. Gary Klausner
Presiding Judge: Douglas F. McCormick
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge by Judge R. Gary Klausner for Report and Recommendation. (See document for details.) (sbou)
December 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/20/2017 ORDERING this matter is TRANSFERRED to the USDC for the Central District of California. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K) [Transferred from California Eastern on 12/21/2017.]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alfred L. Brooks v. D. Borders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: D. Borders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Alfred L. Brooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?