Herman James Bratton v. County of Riverside et al
| Herman James Bratton |
| CDCR, County of Riverside, Does and Riverside County Sheriffs Department |
| 5:2018cv00044 |
| January 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| James V. Selna |
| Gail J. Standish |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna. Pursuant to the Courts Order Dismissing Action Without Prejudice, IT IS ADJUDGED that the above-captioned case is dismissed without prejudice. 56 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge James V. Selna for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 50 . IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Motion is GRANTED; (2) Defendants A. Gayda, J. Rodriguez, R. Garcia, and A. Hadraki are dismissed without leave to amend; (3) Defendants A. Sanchez, P. Sanchez, and Chief Deputy Warden are dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and the Magistrate Judge is directed to issue any appropriate orders with respect to further proceedings in this case. (ec)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge James V. Selna for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 10 . IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the official capacity claims alleged in the First Amended Complaint are dismissed; and (2) the Magistrate Judge shall issue an appropriate order as to further proceedings in this case. (ec)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
