Yancy Alvarez et al v. Access General Insurance et al
| Yancy Alvarez and Justin Roman |
| Access Insurance Company and Does |
| 5:2018cv00336 |
| February 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H. Kewalramani |
| Josephine L. Staton |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 24 by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court DISMISSES this action for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCP 41(b). ( Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing
24
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED by Judge Josephine L. Staton: the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause in writing, no later than five (5) days from the date of this Order, why this case should not be dismissed and handled in the liquidation proceeding. Failure to timely and adequately respond to this Order will result in the dismissal of this action. (jp)
|
|
Filing
17
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER (1) STAYING PROCEEDINGS; (2) DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND (Doc. 11); AND (3) DENYING AS MOOT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MOTION TO REMAND by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Defendant is ORDERED to file a status report every six months regarding the proceedings in Texas. (es)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
