James Rutherford v. Fastrip Oil Company, L.P. et al
Plaintiff: James Rutherford
Defendant: Does 1-10 Inclusive and Fastrip Oil Company, L.P.
Case Number: 5:2018cv00355
Filed: February 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Referring Judge: Consuelo B Marshall
2 Judge: Fernando M Olguin
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 18, 2018 Filing 26 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. Dismissal is With Prejudice. (Manning, Joseph)
June 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Case Terminated; Made JS-6) (vdr)
June 14, 2018 Filing 24 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph)
June 11, 2018 Filing 23 DECLARATION of Joseph R. Manning, Jr. re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, #21 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph)
May 25, 2018 Filing 22 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, #21 , APPLICATION for Default Judgment against Defendant Fastrip Oil Comany, L.P. #20 served on 5/25/2018. (Manning, Joseph)
May 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE:SERVICE OF APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. On the court's own motion, IT IS ORDERED THAT plaintiff's counsel shall forthwith serve the Application for Default Judgment and provide notice of the date of the hearing, currently set for June 21, 2018, at 10:00 a.m., to defendant Fastrip Oil Company, L.P., et al., and file a proof of service no later than two court days following the filing date of this Order. (iv)
May 17, 2018 Filing 20 APPLICATION for Default Judgment against Defendant Fastrip Oil Comany, L.P. filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. Application set for hearing on 6/21/2018 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibit Index of Exhibits, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5, #8 Proposed Order) (Manning, Joseph)
May 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Plaintiff shall file and serve a motion for default judgment no later than 5/17/2018, and notice it for hearing pursuant to the Local Rules. (vdr)
May 2, 2018 Filing 18 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Pursuant to the Default #17 entered, the Order to Show Cause #12 is hereby discharged. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
May 1, 2018 Filing 17 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Fastrip Oil Company, L.P. (iv)
May 1, 2018 Filing 16 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against DEFENDANT Fastrip Oil Company, L.P. filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Attachments: #1 Declaration) (Manning, Joseph)
April 24, 2018 Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph)
April 23, 2018 Filing 14 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against DEFENDANT Fastrip Oil Company, L.P.[ 13]. The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: Proof of Service is lacking required information. Pursuant to C.C.P 415.20 mailing of the documents served is required. Proof of service states a declaration of mailing is attached, but no declaration was attached. Requesting party shall file a new Request/Application with noted deficiencies corrected in order to have default reconsidered. (iv)
April 19, 2018 Filing 13 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against DEFENDANT Fastrip Oil Company, L.P. filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Attachments: #1 Declaration) (Manning, Joseph)
April 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL RE: LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 4/18/2018. (vdr)
April 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER by Judge Fernando M. Olguin: Denying #10 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation. (iv)
March 27, 2018 Filing 10 APPLICATION TO STAY CASE AND EARLY MEDIATION RE ADA DISABILITY ACCESS LITIGATION (Warren, R) Modified on 3/28/2018 (vdr).
March 12, 2018 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Fastrip Oil Company, L.P. served on 3/7/2018, answer due 3/28/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph)
February 23, 2018 Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
February 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 16-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Consuelo B. Marshall to Judge Fernando M. Olguin for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:18-cv-00355 FMO(KKx). (rn)
February 20, 2018 Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Fastrip Oil Company, L.P. (car)
February 20, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (car)
February 20, 2018 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph)
February 20, 2018 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, (Manning, Joseph)
February 20, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph)
February 20, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-21283393 - Fee: $400. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party James Rutherford(pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: James Rutherford v. Fastrip Oil Company, L.P. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10 Inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fastrip Oil Company, L.P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Rutherford
Represented By: Michael John Manning
Represented By: Joseph Richard Manning, Jr
Represented By: Craig G Cote
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?