James Rutherford et al v. Shell et al
Plaintiff: James Rutherford and The Association 4 Equal Access
Defendant: SHELL, a business entity of unknown form, ROYAL RIDGE INVESTMENT, INC., a California Corporation, DOES 1-10 Inclusive, Roya Ridge Investment, Inc., Does 1-10, inclusive and Shell
Case Number: 5:2018cv00566
Filed: March 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale S Fischer
Referring Judge: Sheri Pym
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 11, 2018 Filing 20 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. Dismissal is With Prejudice. (Hashemi, Babak)
May 1, 2018 Filing 19 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Royal Ridge Investment Inc., a California corporation (yl)
April 30, 2018 Filing 18 REQUEST for Entry of Default against Defendant Roya Ridge Investment, Inc., Shell filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Attachments: #1 Declaration) (Hashemi, Babak)
April 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MINUTES(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 5/14/2018. (dp)
April 20, 2018 Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph)
April 18, 2018 Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access, upon Defendant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. CORRECTED (Manning, Joseph)
April 18, 2018 Filing 14 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENT: Document No. 13 filed on 4/18/18 is stricken for failure to comply with Local Rule 11-3.8 which requires a title page on the first page of all documents filed in the form listed in the rule. Counsel has attached the service instructions as the first page THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dp) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
April 18, 2018 Filing 13 ** DOCUMENT STRICKEN ** PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Shell served on 4/4/2018, answer due 4/25/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) Modified on 4/18/2018 (dp).
April 18, 2018 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Roya Ridge Investment, Inc. served on 4/4/2018, answer due 4/25/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph)
March 21, 2018 Filing 11 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (bp)
March 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (pso)
March 20, 2018 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Roya Ridge Investment, Inc. (et)
March 20, 2018 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Shell. (et)
March 20, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
March 20, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (et)
March 19, 2018 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak)
March 19, 2018 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak)
March 19, 2018 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access, (Hashemi, Babak)
March 19, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak)
March 19, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-21437516 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Attorney Babak Hashemi added to party James Rutherford(pty:pla), Attorney Babak Hashemi added to party The Association 4 Equal Access(pty:pla))(Hashemi, Babak)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: James Rutherford et al v. Shell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SHELL, a business entity of unknown form
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROYAL RIDGE INVESTMENT, INC., a California Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-10 Inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roya Ridge Investment, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Rutherford
Represented By: Babak Hashemi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Association 4 Equal Access
Represented By: Babak Hashemi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?