James Rutherford et al v. Red Robin International et al
James Rutherford and The Association 4 Equal Access |
RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Nevada corporation, d/b/a Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, DOES 1-10 Inclusive and Red Robin International Inc. |
5:2018cv00625 |
March 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dale S Fischer |
Sheri Pym |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A) filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access.(Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 19 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DISMISSING CASE DUE TO SETTLEMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Court has been advised by counsel that this action has been settled. Accordingly, it is ordered that the action is dismissed without prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction for 45 days to vacate this Order and to reopen the action on a showing of good cause that the settlement has not been completed and further proceedings are necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dp) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Defendant Red Robin International Inc.. (Parker, Alden) |
Filing 17 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3-5 days, filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access.. (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Katherine Pankow Sandberg on behalf of Defendant Red Robin International Inc. (Attorney Katherine Pankow Sandberg added to party Red Robin International Inc.(pty:dft))(Sandberg, Katherine) |
Filing 15 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 7/16/2018 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (dp) |
Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Red Robin International Inc. (Parker, Alden) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Red Robin International Inc..(Attorney Alden J Parker added to party Red Robin International Inc.(pty:dft))(Parker, Alden) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access, upon Defendant Red Robin International Inc. served on 3/28/2018, answer due 4/18/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 11 CORRECTED- CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access, (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 10 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (dp) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (dp) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 . The following error(s) was found: The caption on the document uploaded to the docket entry number referenced above does not match the case information on the docket (e.g., case title, case number, document name, etc.). The Court may 1)order an amended or corrected document to be filed, 2)order the document stricken, or 3)take other action the Court deems appropriate. You may file a Notice of Errata attaching a corrected version of the document, but you are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (car) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Red Robin International Inc. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (car) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access, (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-21472241 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Attorney Babak Hashemi added to party James Rutherford(pty:pla), Attorney Babak Hashemi added to party The Association 4 Equal Access(pty:pla))(Hashemi, Babak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.