James Rutherford v. Knights Inn et al
Plaintiff: James Rutherford
Defendant: KNIGHT'S INN, a business entity of unknown form, HIGHLAND HOTEL, LP a California limited partnership, DOES 1-10 Inclusive, Knights Inn and Highland Hotel, LP
Not Yet Classified: ASO Maurice II Mandel
Case Number: 5:2018cv00626
Filed: March 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Philip S Gutierrez
Referring Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case #33 : After consideration of the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of the entire action with Prejudice filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford ("Plaintiff") and Knight's Inn and Highland Hotel, LP ("Defendants"), the Court hereby enters a dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff's Complaint in the above-entitled action, in its entirety. Each party shall bear his or its own costs and attorneys' fees. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm)
May 9, 2019 Filing 33 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Joint Stipulation filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Manning, Joseph)
May 8, 2019 Filing 32 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph)
May 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order DENYING Plaintiff's ex parte application and Order to Show Cause re: sanctions by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez re #29 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue: Before the Court is Plaintiff James Rutherford's ("Plaintiff") ex parte application to continue the pretrial conference and trial due to Defendants Knight's Inn and Highland Hotel, LP's ("Defendants") non-participation in mediation and the preparation of joint pretrial filings. See Dkt. no. 29 ("App."). Having read and considered the application, the application is DENIED with the exception that the final pretrial conference is CONTINUED by one day to May 14, 2019 at 2:30 PM. (see document for further details) (bm)
May 8, 2019 Filing 30 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (In Chambers) by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez : On the Court's own motion, the Final Pretrial Conference #22 is reset to 05/14/2019 at 2:30 PM. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (wm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
May 7, 2019 Filing 29 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue Pretrial Conference and Trial from 5/13/19 and 5/28/19 to 90 days filed by plaintiff James Rutherford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Proposed Order) (Manning, Joseph)
April 12, 2019 Filing 28 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION IN LIMINE 1 to Exclude IMPERMISSIBLE CHARACTER EVIDENCE OF PLAINTIFF AT TRIAL filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Manning, Joseph)
March 11, 2019 Filing 27 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr counsel for Plaintiff James Rutherford. Filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph)
February 21, 2019 Filing 26 NOTICE of Change of address by Joseph Richard Manning, Jr attorney for Plaintiff James Rutherford. Changing attorneys address to 20062 SW Birch Street, Suite 200, Newport Beach, CA 92660. Filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph)
October 24, 2018 Filing 25 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Panel Mediator. Mediator (ADR Panel) Maurice II Mandel has been assigned to serve as Panel Mediator. (mb)
August 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER RE JURY TRIAL by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/13/2019, at 2:30 PM and Jury Trial set for 5/28/2019, at 9:00 AM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (smo)
August 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Opening Expert Witness Disclosure: 2/20/2019, Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosure: 3/26/2019, Expert Discovery Cut-off: 4/15/2019, Trial Estimate: 3. Amended Pleadings due by 9/20/2018. Discovery cut-off 2/19/2019. Motions due by 3/4/2019. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/13/2019, at 2:30 PM and Jury Trial set for 5/28/2019, at 9:00 AM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (smo)
August 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be completed by later than March 29, 2019. (ab)
August 13, 2018 Filing 21 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3-5 days, filed by Defendants Highland Hotel, LP, Knights Inn.. (Weiser, Frank)
May 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Scheduling Conference set for 8/20/2018 at 02:00 PM. (wm)
May 11, 2018 Filing 19 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Highland Hotel, LP, Knights Inn, identifying Plaintiff James Rutherford, Defendant Highland Hotel, LP, a California Limited Partnership, Defendant Knight's Inn. (Weiser, Frank)
May 10, 2018 Filing 18 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #17 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (pso)
May 9, 2018 Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants Highland Hotel, LP, Knights Inn.(Attorney Frank A Weiser added to party Highland Hotel, LP(pty:dft), Attorney Frank A Weiser added to party Knights Inn(pty:dft))(Weiser, Frank)
April 20, 2018 Filing 16 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Proof of Service #12 and #13 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. On April 20, Plaintiff re-filed a corrected Proof of Service as to Defendant Knight's Inn. See docket entry #15 . Accordingly, the Proofs of Service found at docket entries #12 and #13 , also as to Defendant Knight's Inn, are rendered moot. (wm)
April 20, 2018 Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph)
April 19, 2018 Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Title page should be page one of the document. Other error(s) with document(s): Parties to adhere to the rules and procedure of the Court when e-filing.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ab)
April 18, 2018 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Highland Hotel, LP served on 4/11/2018, answer due 5/2/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph)
April 18, 2018 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Knights Inn served on 4/3/2018, answer due 4/24/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph)
April 4, 2018 Filing 11 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (wm)
March 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
March 27, 2018 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Highland Hotel, LP. (car)
March 27, 2018 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Knights Inn. (car)
March 27, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
March 27, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (car)
March 26, 2018 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph)
March 26, 2018 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph)
March 26, 2018 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, (Manning, Joseph)
March 26, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph)
March 26, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-21475373 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party James Rutherford(pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: James Rutherford v. Knights Inn et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KNIGHT'S INN, a business entity of unknown form
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HIGHLAND HOTEL, LP a California limited partnership
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-10 Inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Knights Inn
Represented By: Frank A Weiser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Highland Hotel, LP
Represented By: Frank A Weiser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Rutherford
Represented By: Joseph Richard Manning, Jr
Represented By: Osman M Taher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not yet classified: ASO Maurice II Mandel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?