James Rutherford et al v. Bobs Big Boy Calimesa et al
| The Association 4 Equal Access and James Rutherford |
| Lin Chu Tsai, BOBS BIG BOY CALIMESA, a business entity of unknown form, Yun Chih Tsai, DOES 1-10 Inclusive, Does 1-10 and Bobs Big Boy Calimesa |
| Gail Killefer |
| 5:2018cv00653 |
| March 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 41(a)1 filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access.(Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 23 MEDIATION REPORT filed by Mediator (ADR Panel) Gail Killefer: A mediation did not take place because the case settled before the session occurred.(Killefer, Gail) |
| Filing 22 STATEMENT DEFENDANT'S MEDIATION CASE STATEMENT (Sahelian, Ara) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE OF MEDIATION DATE filed. Mediation set for November 19, 2018, at 10:30 a.m.(Killefer, Gail) |
| Filing 20 STATEMENT Plaintiffs' Case Statement re: Order on Application to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation (ADR-22),, Order on Motion to Stay Order (other), #19 . (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 19
ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: granting #18 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to BOBS BIG BOY CALIMESA; YUN CHIH TSAI; LI CHU TSAI.( The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than 11/19/2018.); granting #18 APPLICATION to Stay. Case Terminated. MD JS-6. (twdb)
|
| Filing 18 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation,, APPLICATION to Stay filed by Defendants Bobs Big Boy Calimesa, Does, Lin Chu Tsai, Yun Chih Tsai. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Sahelian, Ara) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants All Defendants, (Attorney Ara Sahelian added to party Does(pty:dft))(Sahelian, Ara) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 JURY DEMAND. filed by Defendants Bobs Big Boy Calimesa, Does, Lin Chu Tsai, Yun Chih Tsai.(Attorney Ara Sahelian added to party Lin Chu Tsai(pty:dft), Attorney Ara Sahelian added to party Yun Chih Tsai(pty:dft))(Sahelian, Ara) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, filed by Defendants Bobs Big Boy Calimesa.(Attorney Ara Sahelian added to party Bobs Big Boy Calimesa(pty:dft))(Sahelian, Ara) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #11 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #13 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. Other error(s) with document(s): Proper case number format is 5:18-cv-00653-JGB(KKx). In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gga) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Bobs Big Boy Calimesa served on 4/24/2018, answer due 5/15/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Lin Chu Tsai served on 4/24/2018, answer due 5/15/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Yun Chih Tsai served on 4/24/2018, answer due 5/15/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hashemi, Babak) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Bobs Big Boy Calimesa. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Lin Chu Tsai, Yun Chih Tsai. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access, (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-21497719 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Attorney Babak Hashemi added to party James Rutherford(pty:pla), Attorney Babak Hashemi added to party The Association 4 Equal Access(pty:pla))(Hashemi, Babak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
