Kenneth E. Romney Jr. et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
| Kenneth E. Romney, Jr. and Tammy Romney |
| Bank of America, N.A. and Shellpoint Mortgage, LLC |
| 5:2018cv00842 |
| April 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F. MacKinnon |
| Stephen V. Wilson |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, the Court hereby ORDERS, ADJUDGES, AND DECREES that: 1. A judgment of dismissal with prejudice is hereby granted against Plaintiffs and in favor of Defendant New Penn Financial, LLC, d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing (erroneously sued as Shellpoint Mortgage, LLC) ("Shellpoint"); 2. Plaintiffs shall take nothing by way of this action; 3. Shellpoint is the prevailing party in this action; and 4. Shellpoint may seek its fees and costs to the extent permitted by law. (mrgo)
|
|
Filing
30
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, in favor of defendant Bank of America, N.A. and against plaintiffs Kenneth E. Romney, Jr, Tammy Romney Related to: Order Dismissing Case, 28 . (mrgo)
|
|
Filing
28
MINUTE ORDER DISMISSING FOR LACK OF STANDING AND NON-OPPOSITION 20 by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: Plaintiffs lacks standing under Article III for each of their claims. Plaintiffs also failed to oppose the motion, as required under Local Rule 7-12. Accordingly, this Court DISMISSES Plaintiffs claims. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
