James Rutherford et al v. Angies Diner LLC et al
The Association 4 Equal Access and James Rutherford |
ANGIES DINER LLC, a California LImited Liability Company, DOES 1-10 Inclusive, Zhen Xing Wu, Yan Xiang Wu and Angies Diner LLC |
5:2018cv00896 |
April 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 21 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Request for 30-Day Extension to Dismiss #20 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case is closed. Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: "Motions and Related Filings" - Applications/Ex Parte Applications/Motions/Petitions/Requests. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ad) |
Filing 20 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Accessto Text Only Scheduling Notice,,, 19 Request for 30-day extension (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 19 SCHEDULING NOTICE and ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. In light of the notice of settlement filed August 6, 2018 (Doc. No. 18), indicating that the case has settled in its entirety, this action is placed in inactive status. By September 10, 2018, the parties shall file either (1) a proper stipulation and order for dismissal or judgment or (2) a motion to reopen if settlement has not been consummated. Upon the failure to timely comply with this Order, this action shall be deemed dismissed as of September 11, 2018. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party. All previously set deadlines and dates are hereby VACATED. (JS-6) THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jlo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Settlement of entire case filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 17 ORDER granting Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer (More than 30 days) #15 , defendant Angies Diner LLC answer due 8/9/2018 by Judge Jesus G. Bernal (twdb) |
Filing 16 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima) |
Filing 15 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 08/09/2018 filed by Defendant Angies Diner LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Attorney Paul Aaron Levine added to party Angies Diner LLC(pty:dft))(Levine, Paul) |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym to Judge Jesus G. Bernal for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 5:18-cv-00896 JGB(SHKx). (rn) |
Filing 13 STATEMENT Consent filed by Defendant Angies Diner LLC Angeloff, Angeloff & LeVine (Levine, Paul) |
Filing 12 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Angies Diner LLC answer now due 7/9/2018, filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford; The Association 4 Equal Access.(Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Yan Xiang Wu served on 5/21/2018, answer due 6/11/2018; Zhen Xing Wu served on 5/21/2018, answer due 6/11/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Angies Diner LLC served on 5/15/2018, answer due 6/5/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 9 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Yan Xiang Wu, Zhen Xing Wu. (car) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Angies Diner LLC. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (car) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access, (Attorney Babak Hashemi added to party The Association 4 Equal Access(pty:pla))(Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-21668060 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford. (Attorney Babak Hashemi added to party James Rutherford(pty:pla))(Hashemi, Babak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.