Dennis Hull v. Mars Petcare US, Inc. et al
| Dennis Hull |
| Does, Mars Petcare US, Inc. and Mars, Incorporated |
| 5:2018cv01021 |
| May 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER AS AMENDED BY THE COURT by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato re Stipulation for Protective Order 42 (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS) (dts)
|
|
Filing
30
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) The Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion to remand by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez denying 20 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court: Because the Court concludes that Defendants have demonstrated that class size exceeds 100 and that the amount in controversy exceeds the requisite $5 million threshold, the Court retains subject matter jurisdiction under CAFA. Accordingly, it DENIES Plaintiff's motion to remand the action to state court. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
