James Rutherford et al v. Snack Attack Mobil, et al
James Rutherford and The Association 4 Equal Access |
SNACK ATTACK MOBIL, a business of unknown form, DOES 1-10 Inclusive, Frank J Burgess, Snack Attack Mobil and Does 1-10, inclusive |
5:2018cv01137 |
May 29, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
S James Otero |
Alka Sagar |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge S. James Otero:The Court has reviewed the Notice of Settlement [ECF #14] filed 08/06/2018, indicating that the parties have reached a settlement in this matter and expect to file a request for dismissal of the action within thirty (30) days. Accordingly, the Court sets an Order to Show re Dismissal hearing on Monday, September 17, 2018 8:30 a.m. The parties shall file a joint status report by Monday, September 10, 2018. If the parties file the appropriate dismissal pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41 prior to this hearing date, this hearing will be vacated. (lc) Modified on 8/28/2018 (lc). |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement of entire case filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge S. James Otero:Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause in writing by not later then August 14, 2018 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The court will consider the filing of the following as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause, on or before the above date: Answer by the Defendant(s) or Plaintiff's request for entry of default. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (lc) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Snack Attack Mobil served on 6/8/2018, answer due 6/29/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Frank J Burgess served on 6/8/2018, answer due 6/29/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge S. James Otero. (vcr) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Frank J Burgess. (esa) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Snack Attack Mobil. (esa) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge S. James Otero and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (esa) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access, (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-21830362 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Attorney Babak Hashemi added to party James Rutherford(pty:pla), Attorney Babak Hashemi added to party The Association 4 Equal Access(pty:pla))(Hashemi, Babak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.