Jose Velez v. Jing Wang Garden et al
Plaintiff: Jose Velez
Defendant: Antonio Canul, Jing Wang Garden, Jovanna M. Rodriguez, Does 1-10, inclusive and Honoria Canul
Case Number: 5:2018cv01698
Filed: August 13, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Referring Judge: S James Otero
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2018 Filing 17 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Correctly refiled Answer to Complaint (Discovery) #16 by both defendants Antonio Canul, Honoria Canul. The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
September 12, 2018 Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), #1 filed by Defendant Antonio Canul, Honoria Canul.(Attorney John Hamilton Belton added to party Honoria Canul(pty:dft))(Belton, John)
September 12, 2018 Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Antonio Canul APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Other error(s) with document(s): As advised previously, the proposed order is to be submitted as a separate attachment to the main document. Instead, filer has efiled the application and order as one pdf document. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
September 12, 2018 Filing 14 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Antonio Canul. (Belton, John)
September 11, 2018 Filing 13 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Jing Wang Garden answer now due 10/13/2018, filed by defendant Jing Wang Garden.(Attorney Michael Joseph Karlin added to party Jing Wang Garden(pty:dft))(Karlin, Michael)
September 6, 2018 Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Antonio Canul. Answer to Complaint (Discovery) #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect document is attached to the docket entry. Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Application: Stay Case and Early Mediation (ADR-21). Other error(s) with document(s): Clarification of the above: 1) if filing was to be answer wrong document attached, and missing certificate of interested party 2) if Filer attempting to file the ADR-21 application: use the correct event for application, to which the proposed order is to be a Separate pdf attachment to that main document. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
September 5, 2018 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), #1 filed by Defendant Antonio Canul.(Attorney John Hamilton Belton added to party Antonio Canul(pty:dft))(Belton, John)
August 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge S. James Otero. (vcr)
August 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 16-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge S. James Otero for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:18-cv-01698 SJO(SHKx). (rn)
August 13, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
August 13, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (esa)
August 13, 2018 Filing 6 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by plaintiff Jose Velez. (esa)
August 13, 2018 Filing 5 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Jovanna M. Rodriguez. (esa)
August 13, 2018 Filing 4 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Jing Wang Garden. (esa)
August 13, 2018 Filing 3 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Honoria Canul. (esa)
August 13, 2018 Filing 2 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Antonio Canul. (esa)
August 13, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendants Antonio Canul, Honoria Canul, Does 1-10, inclusive, Jing Wang Garden, Jovanna M. Rodriguez.Case assigned to Judge Dean D. Pregerson for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani, (Filing fee $ 400 paid), filed by plaintiff Jose Velez. (Attachments: #1 CV-71, #2 envelope) (esa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jose Velez v. Jing Wang Garden et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Antonio Canul
Represented By: John Hamilton Belton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jing Wang Garden
Represented By: Michael Joseph Karlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jovanna M. Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Honoria Canul
Represented By: John Hamilton Belton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose Velez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?