Denise Kish v. Shirley Prasser et al
| Denise Kish |
| Does 1-10, Jill Melanie Curtis, Shirley Prasser and Peter Maurice Curtis |
| 5:2018cv01741 |
| August 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Sheri Pym |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT (SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFICS) (bp) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Jill Melanie Curtis, Peter Maurice Curtis, Shirley Prasser. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Planitiff Denise Kish. (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Denise Kish, (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Denise Kish. (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22277781 - Fee: $400, filed by Planitiff Denise Kish. (Attorney Chris Carson added to party Denise Kish(pty:pla))(Carson, Chris) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
