Nazir Nuhu v. Kirstjen Nielsen et al
Nazir Nuhu |
David Marin, Ronald D. Vitiello, David Shinn, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions and Kirstjen Nielsen |
5:2018cv01814 |
August 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Christina A Snyder |
Michael R Wilner |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Petitioner filed a notice dismissing the petition. (Docket # 9.) This action is dismissed without prejudice. re: Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of an Action (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1)) #9 Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (vm) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Petitioner Nazir Nuhu. Dismissal is without. (Menninger, David) |
Filing 7 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Aaron Kollitz counsel for Respondents David Marin, Kirstjen Nielsen, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, David Shinn, Ronald D. Vitiello. Adding AARON KOLLITZ as counsel of record for USA for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by respondents USA. (Attorney Aaron Kollitz added to party David Marin(pty:res), Attorney Aaron Kollitz added to party Kirstjen Nielsen(pty:res), Attorney Aaron Kollitz added to party Jefferson Beauregard Sessions(pty:res), Attorney Aaron Kollitz added to party David Shinn(pty:res), Attorney Aaron Kollitz added to party Ronald D. Vitiello(pty:res))(Kollitz, Aaron) |
Filing 8 Mail Returned addressed to Nazir Nuhu re: Order re Transfer #5 . Return to sender. Unable to Forward. (hr) |
Filing 6 ORDER FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. It is hereby ORDERED that David Menninger and Elena Sadowsky of the Office of the Federal Public Defender be appointed to represent Petitioner Nazir Nuhu in the above-captioned matter. granting #2 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Appointment of Counsel (vm) |
Filing 5 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO Local Rule 83-1.3.1 and General Order 16-05 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 5:18-cv-01568 CAS(MRW). Case referred from Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner for 194. The case number will now read as follows: 5:18-cv-01814 CAS(MRW). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (rn) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Christina A. Snyder and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (ghap) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by petitioner Nazir Nuhu. Related Case(s): 5:18cv-1568-CAS-MRW, see document for details. (ghap) |
Filing 2 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order Appointing Federal Public Defender; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Declaration of Counsel; Exhibit, filed by Federal Public Defender on behalf of Petitioner Nazir Nuhu. (Attachments: #1 Lodged Proposed Order) (ghap) Modified on 8/29/2018 (ghap). |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In Federal Custody (28:2241) Case assigned to Judge Christina A. Snyder and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H Kewalramani.(Filing fee $ 5:PAID), filed by petitioner Nazir Nuhu. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.