James Rutherford v. Tacos La Bufadora, et al
| James Rutherford |
| TALAT RADWAN, TRUSTEE OF THE J.N.J TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 1, 1996 AND AMENDED SEPTEMBER 5, 2005, DOES 1-10 Inclusive, TACOS LA BUFADORA, a business entity of unknown form, Tacos La Bufadora, Does 1-10, inclusive and Talat Radwan |
| 5:2018cv01848 |
| August 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court AWARDS Plaintiff $4,000 in damages, $600 in attorneys' fees, and reasonable costs pursuant to a Bill of Costs that may be filed in accordance with Local Rule 54-2.1. The Court also ORDERS Defendant Radwan to ensure that the accessible parking space's access aisle and the bathroom's pipes, mirror, grab bar, and toilet paper dispensers comply with the accessibility guidelines promulgated under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and codified at 28 C.F.R. 36.101. (iv) |
Filing 20
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT #19 by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is GRANTED. The Court awards Plaintiff $4,000 in damages, $600 in attorneys' fees, and reasonable costs pursuant to a Bill of Costs that may be filed in accordance with Local Rule 54-2.1. A judgment consistent with this Order will be issued concurrently herewith. (iv)
|
| Filing 19 APPLICATION for Default Judgment against Defendants TACOS LA BUFADORA and TALAT RADWAN, TRUSTEE OF THE J.N.J. TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 1, 1996 AND AMENDED SEPTEMBER 5, 2005 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. Application set for hearing on 12/10/2018 at 01:30 PM before Judge Cormac J. Carney. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibit Index of Exhibits, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5, #8 Proposed Order, #9 Exhibit PROOF OF SERVICE) (Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 18
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff, to show cause in writing no later than November 13, 2018, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiffs, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Plaintiff filing a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (FRCivP 55b). The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiffs is due. (iv)
|
| Filing 17 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Tacos La Bufadora, Talat Radwan, Trustee of the J.N.J. Trust Dated September 1, 1996 and Amended September 5, 2005. (iv) |
| Filing 16 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendants All Defendants filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Attachments: #1 Declaration) (Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 15
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff's counsel, to show cause in writing no later than October 19, 2018, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default. Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (FRCivP 41). The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiffs is due. (iv)
|
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Talat Radwan served on 9/25/2018, answer due 10/16/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Tacos La Bufadora served on 9/25/2018, answer due 10/16/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 12 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: NOTICE TO PARTIES by District Cormac J. Carney. Effective October 9, 2018, Judge Cormac J. Carney will be located in the First Street U.S. Courthouse, Courtroom 7C, on the 7th floor, located at 350 W. 1st Street, Los Angeles, California 90012. All Court appearances shall be made in Courtroom 7C of the First Street U.S. Courthouse unless otherwise ordered by the Court. All required mandatory chambers copies shall be delivered and placed in the drop box located outside the Clerk's Office on the 4th floor of the First Street Courthouse. Judge Carney's Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Melissa H. Kunig, may be reached at (714) 338-2849.The location for filing civil and/or criminal documents in paper format exempted from electronic filing is at Edward R. Roybal Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, 255 East Temple Street, Room 180, Los Angeles, California 90012. Documents under this exemption may also be filed in the Santa Ana or Riverside courthouses.Please refer to Judge Carney's Procedures & Schedules Page on the Court's website **UPDATED AS OF SEPTEMBER 24, 2018** for updated procedures regarding mandatory chambers copies. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rrey) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 11
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 16-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Cormac J. Carney for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:18-cv-01848 CJC(SHKx). (rn)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 16-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge Christina A. Snyder for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:18-cv-01848 CAS (SHKx). (esa)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Talat Radwan. (esa) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Tacos La Bufadora. (esa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (esa) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22340887 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party James Rutherford(pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
