Daniel Lopez v. Halle Properties, L.L.C. et al
| Daniel Lopez |
| Does 1-10, Southern California Discount Tire Co., Inc. and Halle Properties, L.L.C. |
| 5:2018cv01857 |
| August 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to November 13, 2018 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Halle Properties, L.L.C., Southern California Discount Tire Co., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Eaves, Melissa) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Daniel Lopez, upon Defendant Southern California Discount Tire Co., Inc. served on 9/6/2018, answer due 10/27/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: C T CORPORATION SYSTEM in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Southern California Discount Tire Co., Inc. answer now due 10/27/2018; Halle Properties, L.L.C. answer now due 10/27/2018, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Southern California Discount Tire Co., Inc.; Halle Properties, L.L.C..(Attorney Melissa Kooistra Eaves added to party Halle Properties, L.L.C.(pty:dft), Attorney Melissa Kooistra Eaves added to party Southern California Discount Tire Co., Inc.(pty:dft))(Eaves, Melissa) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Daniel Lopez, upon Defendant Halle Properties, L.L.C. served on 9/6/2018, answer due 9/27/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent of Service of Process: Robert J Solis in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (dp)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Halle Properties, L.L.C., Southern California Discount Tire Co., Inc. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (esa) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Daniel Lopez. (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Daniel Lopez, (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Daniel Lopez. (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22349044 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Daniel Lopez. (Attorney Chris Carson added to party Daniel Lopez(pty:pla))(Carson, Chris) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
