Benjamin L. Anderson v. United States Government
| Benjamin L. Anderson |
| United States Government |
| 5:2018cv01870 |
| August 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Sheri Pym |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Benjamin L. Anderson, upon Attorney General of U.S. and U.S. Department of Justice, Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed by certified mail. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (bp) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Benjamin L. Anderson, upon US Attorney Office of California, Civil Process Clerk, served on 9/21/2018, answer due 11/20/2018. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (bp) |
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (dp)
|
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to defendant United States Government (San Diego VA Medical Center). (hr) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: Granting #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (kca)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (lh) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Benjamin L. Anderson. (lh) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Benjamin L. Anderson, (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant United States Government. Case assigned to Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Benjamin L. Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Benjamin L. Anderson v. United States Government | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Government | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Benjamin L. Anderson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
