Rosa Ervin v. County of San Bernardino et al
| Rosa Ervin |
| Sheriff John McMahon, County of San Bernardino, District Attorney Mike Ramos and Does 1 to 10 |
| 5:2018cv01884 |
| September 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Rosa Ervin. (Cervantes, Jose) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22365908 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Rosa Ervin. (Attorney Jose Antonio Cervantes added to party Rosa Ervin(pty:pla))(Cervantes, Jose) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
