Misael Romero v. GTG Properties, LLC et al
Misael Romero |
GTG Properties, LLC, Does 1-10, inclusive and Elizabeth L. Giles, DDS |
5:2018cv01893 |
September 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 20 STATEMENT Plaintiff's Case filed by Plaintiff Misael Romero re: Order on Application to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation (ADR-22),, Order on Motion to Stay Order (other), #19 . (Cornell, Ross) |
![]() |
Filing 18 AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Elizabeth L. Giles, DDS. (Gibson, Mark) |
Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 FIRST AMENDED filed by Defendant GTG Properties, LLC.(Sahelian, Ara) |
Filing 16 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation,, APPLICATION to Stay filed by Defendant GTG Properties, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Sahelian, Ara) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant GTG Properties, LLC, (Sahelian, Ara) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by DEFENDANT GTG Properties, LLC.(Attorney Ara Sahelian added to party GTG Properties, LLC(pty:dft))(Sahelian, Ara) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Elizabeth L. Giles, DDS.(Gibson, Mark) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Elizabeth L. Giles, DDS, identifying None. (Attorney Mark R Gibson added to party Elizabeth L. Giles, DDS(pty:dft))(Gibson, Mark) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Misael Romero, upon Defendant GTG Properties, LLC served on 9/14/2018, answer due 10/5/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon GTG Properties, LLC by David Jin, Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and no service by mail was executed.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Misael Romero, upon Defendant Elizabeth L. Giles, DDS served on 9/12/2018, answer due 10/3/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Elizabeth L. Giles, DDS by Sophia Kim, Incharge in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
![]() |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants GTG Properties, LLC, Elizabeth L. Giles, DDS. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (ghap) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Misael Romero. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Misael Romero, (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Misael Romero. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22373965 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Misael Romero. (Attorney Ross Cornell added to party Misael Romero(pty:pla))(Cornell, Ross) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.