Lawrence Glaser v. Delta T LLC, et al
| Lawrence Glaser dba Fortran Electric, Lawrence Glaser and Lawrence Glaser doing business as Fortran Electric |
| Does 1-10, Delta D dba Big Ass Solutions Company, Delta T LLC and Delta T LLC doing business as Big Ass Solutions Company |
| 5:2018cv01930 |
| September 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), Counterclaim #11 with JURY DEMAND filed by Plaintiff/Cross Defendant Lawrence Glaser.(Sullivan, John) |
| Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Barry D. Hunter to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Delta T LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-22721478) filed by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Delta T LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Harrison, Nicole) |
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 2/11/2019 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , COUNTERCLAIM against Lawrence Glaser filed by Defendant Delta T LLC.(Harrison, Nicole) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Specially Appearing Defendant Delta T LLC, (Harrison, Nicole) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Delta T LLC answer now due 10/26/2018, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Specially Appearing Defendant Delta T LLC.(Attorney Nicole Areli Harrison added to party Delta T LLC(pty:dft))(Harrison, Nicole) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (dp)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Delta T LLC. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Lawrence Glaser dba Fortran Electric, identifying no corporate parents or affilates. (Sullivan, John) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Lawrence Glaser dba Fortran Electric. (Sullivan, John) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Lawrence Glaser dba Fortran Electric. (Sullivan, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22401263 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Lawrence Glaser dba Fortran Electric. (Attorney John W Sullivan added to party Lawrence Glaser dba Fortran Electric(pty:pla))(Sullivan, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
