Audrius Pasvenskas v. US Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Audrius Pasvenskas |
Francis Cissna, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Donna Campagnolo, Kirstjen Nielsen and Irene Martin |
5:2018cv02013 |
September 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Michael W Fitzgerald |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
Naturalization Application |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Audrius Pasvenskas, upon Defendant Donna Campagnolo served on 9/26/2018, answer due 11/26/2018; Francis Cissna served on 9/26/2018, answer due 11/26/2018; Irene Martin served on 9/26/2018, answer due 11/26/2018; Kirstjen Nielsen served on 9/26/2018, answer due 11/26/2018; US Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 9/26/2018, answer due 11/26/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Name Illegible, Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Name unknown, Agent. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Name unknown, Agent. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Return receipts)(Aquino, Romben) |
Filing 10 60 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Donna Campagnolo, Francis Cissna, Irene Martin, Kirstjen Nielsen, US Citizenship and Immigration Services. (iv) |
Filing 9 60 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Donna Campagnolo, Francis Cissna, Irene Martin, Kirstjen Nielsen, US Citizenship and Immigration Services. (iv) |
Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Donna Campagnolo, Francis Cissna, Irene Martin, Kirstjen Nielsen, US Citizenship and Immigration Services. (iv) |
Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Petitioner Audrius Pasvenskas. (Aquino, Romben) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (et) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Petitioner Audrius Pasvenskas, (Aquino, Romben) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Petitioner Audrius Pasvenskas. (Aquino, Romben) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner Audrius Pasvenskas. (Aquino, Romben) |
Filing 1 PETITION For Review of Denial of Naturalization Denial Receipt No: 0973-22456207 - Fee: $400, filed by Petitioner Audrius Pasvenskas. (Attorney Romben Estrada Aquino added to party Audrius Pasvenskas(pty:pet))(Aquino, Romben) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.