James Rutherford v. KFC, et al
James Rutherford |
KFC, Does 1-10, inclusive, Debra S. Lehmer and Steven M. Lehmer |
James Johnston |
5:2018cv02228 |
October 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Sheri Pym |
Otis D Wright |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL OF THE ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE #30 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc) |
Filing 30 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Joint Stipulation filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 29 MEDIATION REPORT Filed by Mediator (ADR Panel) James Johnston: Mediation held on March 19, 2019. The parties are unable to reach an agreement at this time.Counsel: Please evaluate the effectiveness of the ADR Program by completing a survey on your mediation experience. To access the survey, click on the following link: #MediationParticipantSurvey(Johnston, James) |
Filing 28 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Panel Mediator. Mediator (ADR Panel) James Johnston has been assigned to serve as Panel Mediator. (mb) |
Filing 27 NOTICE of Change of address by Joseph Richard Manning, Jr attorney for Plaintiff James Rutherford. Changing attorneys address to 20062 SW Birch Street, Suite 200, Newport Beach, CA 92660. Filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 26 STATEMENT of ADA Mediation Statement First APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #21 Plaintiff's Case Statement filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 25 ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: granting #24 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to defendants KFC, Debra S. Lehmer, Steven M. Lehmer.This action is STAYED for a period of ninety (90) days from the date of the filing of this Order, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than 3/23/2019. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR OTHER SPECIFICS). (lc) |
Filing 24 First APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant KFC, Debra S. Lehmer, Steven M. Lehmer. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Zreik, Sammy) |
Filing 23 ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: First APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #21 , for the following reasons: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Counsel must refile the document and attach the proposed order, then send the proposed order to the judges chambers email address on the court's website. (lc) |
Filing 22 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: First APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #21 by KFC, Debra S. Lehmer, Steven M. Lehmer.. The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Other error(s) with document(s): Missing corresponding order form (obtain form at court's website); afterwhich, As an alternative, prepare and e-file a formal Notice of Lodging, to be docketed only under its specific event: Notice of Lodging, to which the formal proposed order is submitted as Separate Attachment thereto.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
Filing 21 First APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant KFC, Debra S. Lehmer, Steven M. Lehmer. (Zreik, Sammy) Modified on 1/22/2019 (lc).(STRICKEN PER 1/22/2019 ORDER) |
Filing 20 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Debra S. Lehmer, Steven M. Lehmer, KFC, Does. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Zreik, Sammy) |
Filing 19 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant All Defendants, (Attorney Sammy Zreik added to party Does(pty:dft), Attorney Sammy Zreik added to party KFC(pty:dft), Attorney Sammy Zreik added to party Debra S. Lehmer(pty:dft), Attorney Sammy Zreik added to party Steven M. Lehmer(pty:dft))(Zreik, Sammy) |
Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than December 27, 2018 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Plaintiff's request for entry of default as to the defendant-KFC. In the event both documents are filed before the above date, the answer will take precedence. Answer by the defendant(s). No oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (lc) |
Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Debra S. Lehmer served on 12/1/2018, answer due 12/24/2018; Steven M. Lehmer served on 12/1/2018, answer due 12/24/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant KFC served on 11/14/2018, answer due 12/5/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 15 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendants Debra S. Lehmer, Steven M. Lehmer. (lc) |
Filing 14 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant KFC. (lc) |
Filing 13 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 11 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (lc) |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION; PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #7 , Summons Request #8 . The following error(s) was found: The case number and/or judge(s)initials are incorrect. Complete case number MISSING. These summons requests ( in addition to the certificate of interested party and civil coversheet) were efiled after case opening section issued case number (docket no. 2) and its deficiency (docket no. 4). Please include complete case number on all filings as:5:18-cv-02228-ODW-SP. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lc) |
Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 5 Certificate and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff James Rutherford, (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (esa) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (esa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22607039 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff KFC, a business of unknown form. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party KFC, a business of unknown form(pty:dft))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.