James Rutherford v. 99 What a Bargain et al
James Rutherford |
Esther Jeffrey LLC, Does 1-10, inclusive and 99 What a Bargain |
5:2018cv02230 |
October 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Cormac J Carney |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. Dismissal is With Prejudice. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 15 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION ON NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court, having been advised by the Plaintiff that this action has been settled by a Notice of Settlement #14 filed on January 9, 2019, here by orders this action dismissed without prejudice. The Court hereby orders all proceedings in the case vacated and taken off calendar. The Court retains jurisdiction for thirty (30) days to vacate this order and to reopen the action upon showing of good cause that the settlement has not been completed. This order shall not prejudice any party in this action. In light of the Notice of Settlement, the Court further orders the Order to Show Cause #13 issued on January 9, 2019 discharged. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (iv) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 13 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff, to show cause in writing no later than, January 15, 2019 at noon, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiffs, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Defendant(s) Answer or Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default as to defendant(s). The Court may dismiss the entire action prior to the expiration of such time, however, if plaintiff has not diligently prosecuted the action. (iv) |
Filing 12 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to 99 What a Bargain answer now due 1/5/2019, filed by Defendant 99 What a Bargain.(Attorney David E Karlin added to party 99 What a Bargain(pty:dft))(Karlin, David) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Esther Jeffrey LLC served on 11/14/2018, answer due 12/5/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant 99 What a Bargain served on 11/15/2018, answer due 12/6/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Esther Jeffrey LLC. (jp) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant 99 What a Bargain. (jp) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jp) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (jp) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 3 Certificate and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff James Rutherford, (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22607882 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party James Rutherford(pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.