Jaime Hernandez v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
| Jaime Hernandez |
| Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC |
| 5:2018cv02264 |
| October 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Virginia A Phillips |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (bh)
|
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC, re Notice of Reassignment of Eastern Division Removal Case (CV-106) - optional html form, #4 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #5 (by mail on pro per plaintiff) served on 10/24/2018. (Rapoport, Gregg) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: The pro se litigant's email address was added to CM/ECF in error upon the opening of this Notice of Removal case. The pro se litigant's email will be removed from CM/ECF and will not be used for electronic service without the appropriate registration and consent. See Local Rule 53. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 16-05, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:18-cv-2264 VAP (SHKx). (ghap) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF SMALL CLAIMS COURT COMPLAINT against Defendant Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC., filed by plaintiff Jaime Hernandez. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/20/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC, identifying ERC Holdings, LLC. (Rapoport, Gregg) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC. (Rapoport, Gregg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County of San Bernardino, case number SMCFS1806297 Receipt No: 0973-22626750 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Process, pleadings, etc from State Court Action) (Attorney Gregg A Rapoport added to party Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC(pty:dft))(Rapoport, Gregg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jaime Hernandez v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jaime Hernandez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Gregg A Rapoport |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
