James Rutherford et al v. Johnny s Famous Hamburgers, et al
| The Association 4 Equal Access and James Rutherford |
| Does 1-10, inclusive, Jin Seong Kim, Cynthia Soonyeol and Johnny s Famous Hamburgers |
| 5:2018cv02296 |
| October 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Manuel L Real |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement of entire case filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Jin Seong Kim served on 12/17/2018, answer due 2/6/2019; Cynthia Soonyeol served on 12/17/2018, answer due 2/6/2019. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Johnny s Famous Hamburgers served on 12/17/2018, answer due 2/6/2019. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Johnny s Famous Hamburgers answer now due 2/6/2019; Jin Seong Kim answer now due 2/6/2019; Cynthia Soonyeol answer now due 2/6/2019, filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford; The Association 4 Equal Access.(Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Jin Seong Kim, Cynthia Soonyeol. (esa) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Johnny s Famous Hamburgers. (esa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Manuel L. Real and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Manuel L. Real for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Kenly Kiya Kato. New Case Number 5:18-cv-2296 R (KKx). (esa) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access, (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22650780 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Attorney Babak Hashemi added to party James Rutherford(pty:pla), Attorney Babak Hashemi added to party The Association 4 Equal Access(pty:pla))(Hashemi, Babak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
