Emma L. Verlin Scott v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Emma L. Verlin Scott |
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Nancy A. Berryhill |
5:2018cv02338 |
October 31, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Maria A Audero |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Emma L. Verlin Scott, upon Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill served on 11/5/2018, answer due 3/5/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to G. Ortega, Title Unknown,. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Carley Sase, Title Unknown,. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Unknown Signer, Title Unknown, on behalf of General Counsel,. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. Case Management Orders were also served along with Complaint Documents (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipts)(Kuntz, William) |
Filing 12 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero for all further proceedings. Please use the case number EDCV18-2338 MAA on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Emma L. Verlin Scott. (Kuntz, William) |
Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (Attorney Patrick W Snyder added to party Nancy A. Berryhill(pty:dft))(Snyder, Patrick) |
Filing 9 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. In order to facilitate the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this case, the parties shall comply with the instructions contained herein. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the matter will stand submitted as of the date the last filing is due. C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. (cw) |
Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (cw) |
Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero: The Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #3 is GRANTED. (cw) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andrew J. Guilford and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (esa) |
Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Emma L. Verlin Scott. (Kuntz, William) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Emma L. Verlin Scott, identifying United States of America and Social Security Administration. (Kuntz, William) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Emma L. Verlin Scott. (Kuntz, William) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Emma L. Verlin Scott. (Kuntz, William) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Emma L. Verlin Scott. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney William M Kuntz added to party Emma L. Verlin Scott(pty:pla))(Kuntz, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.