VOXX International Corporation et al v. Johnson Safety, Inc.
VOXX International Corporation, Invision Automotive Systems, Inc. and Voxx Electronics Corp. |
Johnson Safety, Inc. |
5:2018cv02421 |
November 15, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
Otis D Wright |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE #11 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II(Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiffs Invision Automotive Systems, Inc., Voxx Electronics Corp., Voxx International Corporation. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Brown, William) |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION; PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc) |
Filing 9 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 5:14-cv-02591 ODW(DTBx). Case transferred from Judge Stephen V. Wilson to Judge Otis D. Wright, II for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:18-cv-02421 ODW(KKx). Signed by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (rn) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Johnson Safety, Inc. (jtil) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (jtil) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiffs Invision Automotive Systems, Inc., VOXX International Corporation, Voxx Electronics Corp.. (Brown, William) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiffs Invision Automotive Systems, Inc., VOXX International Corporation, Voxx Electronics Corp.. Related Case(s): 5:14-cv-02591-ODW(DTBx); 2:17-cv-00358-ODW(DTBx) (Brown, William) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, identifying VOXX International Corporation. (Brown, William) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Invision Automotive Systems, Inc., VOXX International Corporation, Voxx Electronics Corp.. (Brown, William) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22747449 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiffs VOXX International Corporation, Invision Automotive Systems, Inc., Voxx Electronics Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney William J Brown, Jr added to party Invision Automotive Systems, Inc.(pty:pla), Attorney William J Brown, Jr added to party VOXX International Corporation(pty:pla), Attorney William J Brown, Jr added to party Voxx Electronics Corp.(pty:pla))(Brown, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.