Roshona D. Gaston v. Nancy A. Berryhill
| ROSHONA D GASTON and Roshona D. Gaston |
| Acting Commissioner Nancy A Berryhill and Nancy A Berryhill |
| 5:2018cv02424 |
| November 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani: granting #14 APPLICATION to Stay Case (rrey) |
| Filing 14 APPLICATION to Stay Case filed by defendant United States of America (rrey) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for all further proceedings. Please use the case number EDCV18-2424 SHK on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
| Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Nancy A Berryhill. (Attorney Jean M Turk added to party Nancy A Berryhill(pty:dft))(Turk, Jean) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Roshona D. Gaston, upon Defendant Nancy A Berryhill served on 11/26/2018, answer due 1/25/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to GENOVEVA ORTEGA. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to CLERK. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to CIVIL PROCESS CLERK. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons returned. (LaTour, Bill) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by PLAINTIFF Roshona D. Gaston. (LaTour, Bill) |
| Filing 9 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nancy A Berryhill. (dc) |
Filing 8
ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL upon filing of the complaint by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (dc)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani: #5 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby GRANTED. (dc)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by PLAINTIFF ROSHONA D GASTON. (LaTour, Bill) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFF ROSHONA D GASTON, (LaTour, Bill) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by PLAINTIFF ROSHONA D GASTON. (LaTour, Bill) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff ROSHONA D GASTON. (LaTour, Bill) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by PLAINTIFF ROSHONA D GASTON. (Attorney Bill LaTour added to party ROSHONA D GASTON(pty:pla))(LaTour, Bill) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
