Five Star Gourmet Foods, Inc. v. Ready Pac Foods, Inc. et al
| FIVE STAR GOURMET FOODS, INC. |
| Ready Pac Foods, Inc., Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Ready Pac Produce, Inc. |
| 5:2018cv02436 |
| November 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Dean D Pregerson |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 145 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Five Star's First Amended Complaint filed by defendants Ready Pac Foods, Inc., Ready Pac Produce, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 3/18/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED, #2 Proposed Order GRANTING DEFENDANTS READY PAC FOODS, INC., AND READY PAC PRODUCE, INC. MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED) (Crockett, K) |
| Filing 16 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Ready Pac Foods, Inc., Ready Pac Produce, Inc. amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by plaintiff Five Star Gourmet Foods, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Larson, Stephen) |
Filing 15
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dean D. Pregerson., Scheduling Conference set for 3/25/2019 at 01:30 PM (yl)
|
|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Counsel are encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The address is http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov. It is not necessary to clear a motion date with the Court Clerk prior to filing the motion. The Court hears motions only on Mondays at 10:00 a.m. (See minutes for further details) (yl)
|
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Five Star Gourmet Foods, Inc., upon Defendant Ready Pac Produce, Inc. served on 12/4/2018, answer due 12/26/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Maria Gutierrez, Paralegal/Authorized to Accept in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Larson, Stephen) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Five Star Gourmet Foods, Inc., upon Defendant Ready Pac Foods, Inc. served on 12/4/2018, answer due 12/26/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Maria Gutierrez, Paralegal/Authorized to Accept in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Larson, Stephen) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Ready Pac Foods, Inc., Ready Pac Produce, Inc., identifying Bonduelle SAS; Ready Pac Foods, Inc.; Ready Pac Produce, Inc.; Salad Time, LLC; Ready Pac Florence Partnership; Missa Bay, LLC; OBIM Fresh-cut Fruit Co., LLC. (Crockett, K) |
| Filing 10 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss as to the first claim (design patent infringement), the second claim (trade dress infringement), and the third claim (unfair competition) without leave to amend, First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case without leave to amend filed by defendants Ready Pac Foods, Inc., Ready Pac Produce, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 3/11/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED, #2 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS READY PAC FOODS, INC., AND READY PAC PRODUCE, INC. MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED) (Attorney K David Crockett added to party Ready Pac Foods, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney K David Crockett added to party Ready Pac Produce, Inc.(pty:dft)) (Crockett, K) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ready Pac Foods, Inc., Ready Pac Produce, Inc. (car) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (car) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff FIVE STAR GOURMET FOODS, INC., identifying Five Star Gourmet Foods, Inc.; Ready Pac Foods, Inc.; Ready Pac Produce, Inc.; Bonduelle. (Larson, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by FIVE STAR GOURMET FOODS, INC.. (Larson, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff FIVE STAR GOURMET FOODS, INC. (Larson, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff FIVE STAR GOURMET FOODS, INC.. (Larson, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff FIVE STAR GOURMET FOODS, INC.. (Larson, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22764514 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff FIVE STAR GOURMET FOODS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Stephen Gerard Larson added to party FIVE STAR GOURMET FOODS, INC.(pty:pla))(Larson, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
