James Rutherford et al v. Royal Panda Restaurant et al
| THE ASSOCIATION 4 EQUAL ACCESS;, James Rutherford and The Association 4 Equal Access |
| Does 1-10, Inclusive,, ROYAL PANDA RESTAURANT, a business of unknown form, GALILEO SAN DIMAS, LP, a Delaware limited partnership;, Does 1-10, inclusive, Galileo San Dimas, LP and Royal Panda Restaurant |
| 5:2018cv02465 |
| November 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Sheri Pym |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. Dismissal is with Prejudice. (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 19
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION ON NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court, having been advised that this action has been settled by a Notice of Settlement #18 , hereby orders this action dismissed without prejudice. The Court hereby orders all proceedings in the case vacated and taken off calendar. In light of the Notice of Settlement, the Court further orders the Order to Show Cause #10 issued on February 20, 2019 discharged. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (iv)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Settlement Defendant Brixmor GA San Dimas, LP's Notice of Settlement filed by Defendant Galileo San Dimas, LP. (Gao, Kathy) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) with prejudice as to Royal Panda Restaurant. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Galileo San Dimas, LP answer now due 4/4/2019, filed by Defendant Galileo San Dimas, LP.(Attorney Kathy H Gao added to party Galileo San Dimas, LP(pty:dft))(Gao, Kathy) |
| Filing 15 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Royal Panda Restaurant. (iv) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proof of Service list substituted service date of 2/12/2019, however during the filing sequence filer states service was completed on 1/16/2019. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv) |
| Filing 13 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Royal Panda Restaurant filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Attachments: #1 Declaration) (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Royal Panda Restaurant served on 1/16/2019, answer due 2/6/2019. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Galileo San Dimas, LP served on 1/16/2019, answer due 2/6/2019. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hashemi, Babak) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiffs counsel, to show cause in writing no later than February 22, 2019, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Proof of service of summons and complaint (however, if the deadline to Answer has already passed, plaintiff(s) must also submit a Request for Default or Stipulation Extending Time to Answer). Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (FRCivP 41). The Court may dismiss the action prior to the expiration of such time, however, if plaintiffs have not diligently prosecuted the action. (iv)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Galileo San Dimas, LP. (et) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Royal Panda Restaurant. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (et) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, THE ASSOCIATION 4 EQUAL ACCESS;. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, THE ASSOCIATION 4 EQUAL ACCESS;. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, THE ASSOCIATION 4 EQUAL ACCESS;, (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, THE ASSOCIATION 4 EQUAL ACCESS;. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22783982 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs James Rutherford, THE ASSOCIATION 4 EQUAL ACCESS;. (Attorney Babak Hashemi added to party James Rutherford(pty:pla), Attorney Babak Hashemi added to party THE ASSOCIATION 4 EQUAL ACCESS;(pty:pla))(Hashemi, Babak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
