Janos Hamori v. United States Postal Service
Janos Hamori |
United States Postal Service |
5:2018cv02466 |
November 21, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
George H Wu |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER by Judge George H. Wu. To determine whether Plaintiff explicitly consents to dismissing this action, the Court would order that the parties appear on January 28, 2019 at 8:30 am. If Plaintiff fails to show up, the Court will consider Plaintiff's representations in his filing as explicit consent to the dismissal of this action. If Plaintiff does appear and echoes his wish to dismiss his own action, the Court would of course oblige. (lom) |
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant United States Postal Service, re Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan #12 served on 1/4/2019. (Park, Grace) |
Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge George H. Wu re: #7 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Dismiss ; and #11 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay Case. The Court denies without prejudice Defendant's Ex Parte Application for a Stay of the Entire Case Due to the Lapse of Appropriations, Docket No. 11, and it orders Plaintiff to file a response to the Motion to Dismiss, Docket No. 7 by no later than January 18, 2019 at noon. (mrgo) |
Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 0.5 days, filed by Defendant United States Postal Service.. (Park, Grace) |
Filing 11 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay Case pending DEFENDANT'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A STAY OF THE ENTIRE CASE DUE TO THE LAPSE OF APPROPRIATIONS; [PROPOSED] ORDER AND DECLARATION OF GRACE Y. PARK filed by Defendant United States Postal Service. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proof of Service) (Park, Grace) |
Filing 10 REPLY in support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint filed by Defendant United States Postal Service. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Park, Grace) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu. (Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/3/2019. Scheduling Conference set for 1/10/2019 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu.) (mrgo) |
Filing 8 Standing Order Re Final Pre-Trial Conferences for Civil Jury Trials Before Judge George H. Wu by Judge George H. Wu. (See document for details) (mrgo) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by defendant United States Postal Service. Motion set for hearing on 1/10/2019 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Herbst, #2 Declaration of Park, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Proof of Service) (Park, Grace) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Complaint filed by defendant United States Postal Service. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Herbst, #2 Declaration G. Park, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Proof of Service)(Park, Grace) |
Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant United States Postal Service. (Park, Grace) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (car) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 16-05, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge George H. Wu. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:18-CV-02466 GW (SHKx). (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF SMALL CLAIMS COURT COMPLAINT against Defendant United States Postal Service, filed by plaintiff Janos Hamori. Filed in State Court on 9/14/18 Submitted with attachment 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) Modified on 11/26/2018 (car). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino, case number SMCBS1801738 No Fee Required - US Government, filed by defendant United States Postal Service. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Proof of Service) (Attorney Grace Y Park added to party United States Postal Service(pty:dft))(Park, Grace) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Janos Hamori v. United States Postal Service | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States Postal Service | |
Represented By: | Grace Y Park |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Janos Hamori | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.