Barbara Moreno v. Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC et al
Barbara Moreno |
Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC and Does 1-25, inclusive |
5:2018cv02473 |
November 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Virginia A Phillips |
Sheri Pym |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) VACATING JANUARY 28, 2019 HEARING by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: Accordingly, in light of the parties' stipulation, the Court VACATES the January 28, 2019 hearing on the Motion to Dismiss. The parties shall include a proposed date for the hearing in their January 29, 2019 status report as indicated in the stipulation, (Doc. No. 8), and the Courts prior order, (Doc. No. 10). (bm) |
Filing 14 ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: granting #12 Non-Resident Attorney Andrew G. Phillips APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC, designating Rachel E.K. Lowe as local counsel. (bm) |
Filing 13 ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: granting #11 Non-Resident Attorney Angela M. Spivey APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC, designating Rachel E.K. Lowe as local counsel. (bm) |
Filing 12 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Andrew G. Phillips to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-22912137) filed by Defendant Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 List of Courts to which Admitted and in Good Standing, #2 Certificate of Good Standing - Georgia, #3 Proposed Order) (Attorney Andrew G Phillips added to party Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC(pty:dft)) (Phillips, Andrew) |
Filing 11 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Angela M. Spivey to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-22904182) filed by Defendant Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificates of Good Standing - Georgia and Mississippi, #2 Proposed Order) (Attorney Angela M Spivey added to party Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC(pty:dft)) (Spivey, Angela) |
Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION STAYING ACTION AND DEFENDANT PINNACLE FOODS GROUP, LLC'S DEADLINE TORESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips, re Stipulation to Stay Case #8 : Having considered the parties Joint Stipulation and good cause appearing therefor, the Court GRANTS the Joint Stipulation. This action is hereby stayed until January 29, 2019. All deadlines, including the deadline of defendant Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC to respond to the operative complaint, are stayed. If this action is not otherwise dismissed before that date, the parties are directed to submit a status report to the Court by January 29, 2019 that includes a deadline for defendant's anticipated responsive pleading and, if necessary, a briefing schedule for a motion to dismiss. (bm) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 1/28/2019 at 02:00 PM before Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Rachel E. K. Lowe In Support Of, #3 Exhibit A through F In Support of Decl of R. Lowe, #4 Request for Judicial Notice, #5 Proposed Order) (Lowe, Rachel) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Product Analysis following Corporate Acquisition for 60 days filed by Defendant Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Rachel E. K. Lowe, #2 Proposed Order)(Lowe, Rachel) |
Filing 7 STANDING ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (bh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 16-05, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:18-cv-2473 VAP (SPx). (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-25, Inclusive, Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC., filed by plaintiff Barbara Moreno. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/19/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 served on 11/26/18. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Lowe, Rachel) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC, identifying Pinnacle Foods, Inc., Conagra Brands Inc.. (Lowe, Rachel) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC. (Lowe, Rachel) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Bernardino, case number CIVDS1827269 Receipt No: 0973-22789424 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit C to Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit D to Notice of Removal, #5 Declaration of Caroline Wright in Support of Defendant Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC's Notice of Removal) (Attorney Rachel E K Lowe added to party Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC(pty:dft))(Lowe, Rachel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.