Richard Johnson v. Unknown
Richard Lee Johnson |
Unknown |
5:2018cv02486 |
November 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson. Related to: Order Summarily Dismissing Petition #7 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice and the certificate of appealability is DENIED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr) |
Filing 7 ORDER SUMMARILY DISMISSING PETITION AS PREMATURE AND UNEXHAUSTED by Judge Percy Anderson. 1. The Petition is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 2. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. (see order for details) (hr) |
Filing 6 Mail Returned addressed to Richard Lee Johnson re Notice of Reference to US Magistrate Judge (CV-84) (Habeas Corpus) #5 . Not in custody. (hr) |
Filing 4 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from California Southern |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV111 Notice Re Discrepancies in Filing of Habeas Corpus Petition, #2 CV-60P) (car) |
Filing 3 Case transferred to District of Central District of California, Eastern Division. Files transferred electronically to: *District of Central District of California, Eastern Division*.*3470 12th Street, 1st Floor**Riverside, CA 92501-3801*. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 11/20/2018. (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) (sjt). [Transferred from California Southern on 11/28/2018.] |
Filing 2 SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENT by Richard Johnson. (jms) [Transferred from California Southern on 11/28/2018.] |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Unknown, filed by Richard Johnson.($5 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Not Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-2573-JAH-AGS. Judge John A. Houston and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening] (jms) (jao). [Transferred from California Southern on 11/28/2018.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Richard Johnson v. Unknown | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Richard Lee Johnson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Unknown | |
Represented By: | Attorney General |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.