Jenniger Cowgill et al v. OMNI Hotels Management Corporation et al
Jenniger Cowgill and Burton Cowgill |
OMNI Hotels Management Corporation, OMNI Rancho Las Palmas Resort and Does 1 to 25, Inclusive |
5:2018cv02544 |
December 3, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
R Gary Klausner |
Alka Sagar |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court of California, Palm Springs. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court of California, Palm Springs. (bp) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 10 First STIPULATION to Remand Case to State Court filed by Plaintiff Jenniger Cowgill. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shlesinger, Kimberly) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 6 Defendant NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant OMNI Hotels Management Corporation, (Julian, Jocelyn) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 1 Civil Cover Sheet is attached to the Notice of Removal. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 to 25, Inclusive, OMNI Hotels Management Corporation, OMNI Rancho Las Palmas Resort.Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiffs Jenniger Cowgill, Burton Cowgill. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/19/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
NON CONFORM COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant OMNI Hotels Management Corporation. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT B)(ghap) Modified on 12/4/2018 (ghap). |
NON CONFORM COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jenniger Cowgill, Burton Cowgill, upon Defendant OMNI Hotels Management Corporation served on 4/17/2018, answer due 5/8/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC Lawyers Registered Agent by leaving with Bills Jacobs Person Authorized to Accept in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT K) (ghap) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California Palm Springs Courthouse, case number PSC1801602 Receipt No: 0973-22837419 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant OMNI Hotels Management Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate of Service) (Attorney Jocelyn A Julian added to party OMNI Hotels Management Corporation(pty:bkmov))(Julian, Jocelyn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.