Diamond Barner v. United Parcel Services, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Diamond Barner
Defendant: Does 1 through 50, inclusive, United Parcel Services, Co. and United Parcel Services, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2018cv02633
Filed: December 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Cormac J Carney
Referring Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 26, 2018 Filing 10 NOTICE OF INTENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Scheduling order to be issued on 3/11/2019. (vv)
December 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 16-05 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Case transferred from Judge John A. Kronstadt to the calendar of Judge Cormac J. Carney for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 5:18-cv-02633 CJC(SHKx). (rn)
December 20, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
December 20, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 16-05, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge John A. Kronstadt. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:18-cv-2633 JGB (SHKx). (ghap)
December 19, 2018 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant United Parcel Services, Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/17/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C)(ghap)
December 19, 2018 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Diamond Barner, upon Defendant United Parcel Services, Inc. served on 11/30/2018, answer due 12/21/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Becky DeGeorge-CSC-Person Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/3/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B) (ghap)
December 19, 2018 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 50, inclusive, United Parcel Services, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Diamond Barner. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/31/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap)
December 19, 2018 Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant United Parcel Services, Co., re Notice (Other), #5 Defendant's Notice of Filing served on December 19, 2018. (Cocanig, Cody)
December 19, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE Defendant's Notice of Filing filed by Defendant United Parcel Services, Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "1" Defendant's Notice to State Court and to Adverse Parties of Removal to Federal Court, #2 Exhibit "2" Proof of Service)(Cocanig, Cody)
December 19, 2018 Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant United Parcel Services, Co., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on December 19, 2018. (Cocanig, Cody)
December 19, 2018 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant United Parcel Services, Co. identifying United Parcel Service Co. as Corporate Parent. (Cocanig, Cody)
December 19, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant United Parcel Services, Co.. (Cocanig, Cody)
December 19, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior Court, case number CIVDS1828844 Receipt No: 0973-22923591 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant United Parcel Services, Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A" Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit "B" Proof of Service of Summons & Complaint, #3 Exhibit "C" Answer, #4 Exhibit "D" Decl of Hijar ISO Removal, #5 Exhibit "E" Decl of Cocanig ISO Removal) (Attorney Cody Joseph Cocanig added to party United Parcel Services, Co.(pty:dft))(Cocanig, Cody)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Diamond Barner v. United Parcel Services, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Parcel Services, Co.
Represented By: Cody Joseph Cocanig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Parcel Services, Inc.
Represented By: Stacy L Fode
Represented By: Cody Joseph Cocanig
Represented By: Janice P Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diamond Barner
Represented By: Maya L Serkova
Represented By: Dimuth C Amaratunge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?