Michael James Mayo v. County of San Bernardino
| Michael James Mayo |
| County of San Bernardino |
| 5:2018cv02639 |
| December 20, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Suzanne H Segal |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES #4 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees is: DENIED, with leave to amend within 30 days. Plaintiff may re-submit the IFP application and Complaint to this Court,if submitted with the Certified Trust Account Statement and Disbursement Authorization. Plaintiff shall utilize the same case number. If plaintiff fails to submit the required documents within 30 days, this case shall be DISMISSED. (lom)
|
| RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. Re NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) #4 . Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval.(mr) |
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal, ORDERING Letter submitted by Plaintiff Michael James Mayo received on 1/04/19 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: No letters to the judge. (mr)
|
| Filing 3 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from California Southern |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and referred to Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) (lh) |
| Filing 2 Case transferred to Central District of California, Eastern Division. Files transferred electronically to: *Central District of California, Eastern Division*.*3470 Twelfth Street**Riverside, CA 92501-3801*. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 12/19/2018. (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef) (sjt). [Transferred from California Southern on 12/21/2018.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against County of San Bernardino, filed by Michael James Mayo.($400 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Not Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-2806-CAB-LL. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms) [Transferred from California Southern on 12/21/2018.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Michael James Mayo v. County of San Bernardino | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael James Mayo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: County of San Bernardino | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
