Sanjay Sobti v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
| Sanjay Sobti |
| Michael R Pompeo, Department of State, USCIS, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, John Does (1-5), Associate Director JENNIFER B. HIGGINS, Carl C. Risch, Tracy Renaud, Matthew G. Whitaker, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN and FRANCIS CISSNA |
| 5:2018mc00015 |
| December 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of New Case Number and Judge Assignment by Clerk. This case is hereby converted from case type MC to case type CV because the incorrect case type was used at case opening. A new case number has therefore been assigned to this case. District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato are assigned to this new case number. All future documents must be filed under the new case number, which is 5:18-cv-02573-JGB-KKx. The previous case number, 5:18mc00015, is hereby terminated. (car) |
| Filing 1 Petition For Writ of Mandamus And Complaint For Declaratory and Injunctive Relief Receipt No: 0973-22863455 - Fee: $47, filed by Plaintiff Sanjay Sobti. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit) (Attorney Sanjay Sobti added to party Sanjay Sobti(pty:pla))(Sobti, Sanjay) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
