Gabriel Galindo v. Exel, Inc. et al
| Gabriel Galindo |
| Exel, Inc. dba DHL Supply Chain (USA), Exel, Inc., Does 1-10, inclusive and Exel, Inc. a corporation form unknown doing business as DHL Supply Chain USA |
| 5:2019cv00115 |
| January 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Answer to Complaint - State Court filed by Defendant Exel, Inc. re: Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #12 (Kingston, Sean) |
Filing 12
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. Scheduling Conference set for 4/8/2019 at 11:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (jlo)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (car) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED DOCUMENT filed by Defendant Exel, Inc.. Amendment to Declaration, #3 of Sean T. Kingston in Support of Removal of Action (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 In Support of Declaration of Sean Kingston Re Removal, #2 Exhibit 2 In Support of Declaration of Sean Kingston Re Removal, #3 Exhibit 3 Attached to Declaration of Sean T. Kingston In Support of Notice of Removal)(Kingston, Sean) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, inclusive, Exel, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Gabriel Galindo. Filed in State Court on 11/5/18 Submitted with Exhibit 1 attachment 7 to Amended Document #7 [Amending Declaration of Sean T. Kingston] (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Exel, Inc. Filed in State Court on 1/16/19 Submitted with Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Sean T. Kingston #3 .(car) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Exel, Inc. dba DHL Supply Chain (USA), identifying Exel, Inc. dba DHL Supply Chain (USA). (Kingston, Sean) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Exel, Inc. dba DHL Supply Chain (USA) identifying DPWN Holdings (USA) as Corporate Parent. (Kingston, Sean) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of Allison Haedt re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Exel, Inc. dba DHL Supply Chain (USA). (Kingston, Sean) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Sean T. Kingston re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Exel, Inc. dba DHL Supply Chain (USA). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Attached to Declaration of Sean T. Kingston In Support of Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit 2 Attached to Declaration of Sean T. Kingston In Support of Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit 3 Attached to Declaration of Sean T. Kingston In Support of Notice of Removal)(Kingston, Sean) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Exel, Inc. dba DHL Supply Chain (USA). (Kingston, Sean) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino County Superior Court, case number CIVDS-1829066 Receipt No: 0973-23069027 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Exel, Inc. dba DHL Supply Chain (USA). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A Attached to Notice to Removal) (Attorney Sean T Kingston added to party Exel, Inc. dba DHL Supply Chain (USA)(pty:dft))(Kingston, Sean) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
