Verada Reynolds v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Verada Reynolds
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 5:2019cv00150
Filed: January 25, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2019 Filing 16 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar for all further proceedings. Please use the case number EDCV19-150 AS on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn)
February 26, 2019 Filing 15 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by PLAINTIFF Verada Reynolds. (Padilla, Rebecca)
February 25, 2019 Filing 14 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (Attorney Armand D Roth added to party Nancy A. Berryhill(pty:dft))(Roth, Armand)
February 14, 2019 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Verada Reynolds, upon Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill served on 2/7/2019, answer due 6/7/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to F.DeLaRosa. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to UNKNOWN. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to UNKNOWN. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Padilla, Rebecca)
February 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (see document for details) (Attachments: #1 Blank Consent Form) (hr)
February 6, 2019 Filing 11 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (hr)
February 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #9 by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (clee)
February 5, 2019 Filing 9 REQUEST to AMENDED Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) - optional html form,, #7 , REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #5 , Response By Court to Notice of Deficiencies (G-112B) - optional html form, #8 AMENDED REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH DECLARATION IN SUPPORT filed by PLAINTIFF Verada Reynolds. (Padilla, Rebecca)
February 1, 2019 Filing 8 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #5 by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. Plaintiff is ordered to file and "Amended Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis". (See document for complete details) (afe)
February 1, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #5 . The following error was found: Plaintiff has failed to provide a complete response to: Question 1 (a). In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (afe)
January 28, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Manuel L. Real and referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (lh)
January 25, 2019 Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by PLAINTIFF Verada Reynolds. (Padilla, Rebecca)
January 25, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFF Verada Reynolds, identifying VERADA REYNOLDS AND COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. (Padilla, Rebecca)
January 25, 2019 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by PLAINTIFF Verada Reynolds. (Padilla, Rebecca)
January 25, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Verada Reynolds. (Padilla, Rebecca)
January 25, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by PLAINTIFF Verada Reynolds. (Attorney Rebecca Christina Padilla added to party Verada Reynolds(pty:pla))(Padilla, Rebecca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Verada Reynolds v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Verada Reynolds
Represented By: Rebecca Christina Padilla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: Armand D Roth
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?