Jose Martin Ulloa Vargas v. Nancy A. Berryhill
| Jose Martin Ulloa Vargas |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| 5:2019cv00269 |
| February 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Charles F Eick |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick for all further proceedings. Please use the case number EDCV19-269 on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Jose Martin Ulloa Vargas. (Kuntz, William) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jose Martin Ulloa Vargas, upon Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill served on 3/4/2019, answer due 7/2/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to G. Ortega, Title Unknown,. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Carley Sase, Title Unknown,. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Unknown Signer, Title Unknown, on behalf of General Counsel,. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. Case Management Orders were also served along with Complaint Documents (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipts)(Kuntz, William) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (Attorney Annabelle J Yang added to party Nancy A. Berryhill(pty:dft))(Yang, Annabelle) |
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. Plaintiff shall promptly serve the Summons and Complaint on defendant and shall file a proof of such service within 30 days of the date of this Order. Failure to comply with this aspect of this Order may result in the issuance of an Order to Show Cause Re Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute. It is Ordered that defendant's time to plead to the complaint is extended such that defendant's pleading must be filed within 90 days of service of the complaint. Defendant shall file a transcript of the administrative proceedings at the same time that defendant pleads to the complaint. A paper copy of the transcript of the administrative proceedings must be submitted directly to chambers within 24 hours of the time defendant pleads to the complaint. Because cases of this nature are almost invariably resolved by motion for summary judgment or remand, pre-trial proceedings are ordered waived. Within 30 days of the filing of defendant's answer, the plaintiff shall file a motion for summary judgment or remand. Within 30 days of the filing of plaintiff's motion for summary judgment or remand, defendant shall file a motion for summary judgment or remand. If either party believes that the case cannot be resolved by motion, such party shall so advise the Court and the opposing party in writing. The Court will take the motions under submission without oral argument, unless the Court otherwise orders. (sp)
|
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (lh) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jose Martin Ulloa Vargas. (Kuntz, William) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jose Martin Ulloa Vargas, identifying United States of America and Social Security Administration. (Kuntz, William) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jose Martin Ulloa Vargas. (Kuntz, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23187244 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Jose Martin Ulloa Vargas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney William M Kuntz added to party Jose Martin Ulloa Vargas(pty:pla))(Kuntz, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jose Martin Ulloa Vargas v. Nancy A. Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jose Martin Ulloa Vargas | |
| Represented By: | William M Kuntz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
| Represented By: | Annabelle J Yang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
