US Bank Trust, N.A. v. Sergio Alvarez et al
| US Bank Trust, N.A. |
| Alicia Rosas, Does 1 to 6, Inclusive and Sergio Alvarez |
| 5:2019cv00271 |
| February 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Sheri Pym |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Clerk, San Bernardino Superior Court, Fontana District. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Clerk, San Bernardino Superior Court, Fontana District. (gk) |
Filing 9
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Although Plaintiff has filed a motion to remand #7 and an application for order shortening time #8 , this Court can examine its own subject matter jurisdiction at any time. Having determined that it does not have subject matter jurisdiction over this case, the Court sua sponte orders this action REMANDED to the San Bernardino County Superior Court, Case No. UDFS1807791. Plaintiff's motion to remand and application for order shortening time are DENIED as moot. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 8 APPLICATION to Shorten Time for Hearing on re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to San Bernardino Superior Court #7 to 04/05/2019 filed by Plaintiff US Bank Trust, N.A.. Application set for hearing on 5/3/2019 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Shortening Time, #2 Supplement Certificate of Service) (Naiman, Randall) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to San Bernardino Superior Court filed by Plaintiff US Bank Trust, N.A.. Motion set for hearing on 5/3/2019 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration Declaration of Randall D. Naiman, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Remand Order, #4 Supplement Certificate of Service) (Naiman, Randall) |
|
Filing 6
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 16-05, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Dolly M. Gee. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:19-cv-00271-DMG (SPx). (et) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Sergio Alvarez, re Notice of Removal, #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 served on 2/10/2019. (et) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Sergio Alvarez. (et) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of CA for the County of San Bernardino, Fontana Courthouse, case number UDFS1807791 with CONFORMED FILED copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. Filing fee $400 PAID., filed by Defendant Sergio Alvarez. (Attachments: #1 Part 1 to Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
